0.25
0.5
0.75
1.25
1.5
1.75
2
Wither OWL in a knowledge-graphed, Linked-Data World?
Published on Jul 28, 20163080 Views
The need for ontologies in the real world is manifest and increasing. On the Web, ontologies are increasingly needed — but OWL isn’t being used in many of these applications. This talk explores some
Related categories
Chapter list
Wither OWL - 100:51
Wither OWL - 201:34
Wither OWL - 501:35
Wither OWL - 602:32
Example: Semantic Search02:33
Contenders ca. 2010 - 103:04
Contenders ca. 2010 - 203:54
Google 201404:42
Other success stories06:46
Some others08:28
Watson used Semantic Web08:42
All cool, but…09:14
Why not OWL?10:27
What I used to think the problem is13:12
Ontology: the OWL DL view13:27
ontology: the RDFS view14:37
ROI: Reasoning over (Enterprise) data15:48
WHAT I USED TO BELIEVE15:48
WHAT I NOW BELIEVE17:17
BUT, not quite the same way17:28
What I am coming to believe18:44
We were right: The Web is increasingly about LINKING DATA19:34
Current linked data approaches are also broken!20:59
What we need26:25
What’s the problem29:49
Example: Mereology (and meronymy)31:42
But, what? Wait!34:06
Database mapping35:46
When?36:28
Geophysical reasoning38:18
SIMPLE relationship reasoning39:37
Digression… (and shameless self promotion)41:00
Back to our regularly scheduled talk: Procedural Attachment?41:49
Procedural Attachment43:16
Exploring knowledge graphs44:05
Integrating45:07
Integrate45:23
Our Approach - 145:54
Our Approach - 246:12
I could go on46:56
My challenge49:06
Challenge51:26
I’m not “anti-formalism”52:27
Summary54:11
Acknowledgments55:39
ANY QUESTIONS?56:26